All fields are required. The E-mail Address(es) field is necessary. Please, get into the recipient e-mail address(es). The E-mail Address(es) you came into is (are) not in a valid format. Please, re-enter receiver e-mail address(es). You might send this item to up to five recipients. Enter recipient e-mail address(es): Separate up to five addresses with commas (, ) The true name field is necessary. Please, enter your name. Enter your name: The topic field is necessary. Please, enter the subject. Subject: The E-mail message field is required. Please, enter the message.
This is similar to a comment credit card system where you are anticipated to react to the majority of the questions and concerns. Maybe it’s a powerful complete system, but there’s a heavy staff time investment required. Obama agenda suggestion implementation (it does not appear to be affiliated with or sponsored by the Obama team).
It is nearly the same as IdeaScale, concentrating on making suggestions, voting, and commenting, with one unique difference: users receive a set variety of votes (10) to distribute among the ideas outlined. While suggesting a new idea is in advance on the webpage, the fact that you merely have ten votes to spread around provides a game-like element that concentrates you on looking into many ideas and distributing your votes sensibly. For this reason, the service may be a fascinating tool to use if you want visitors to vote for options in a controlled way where different users’ efforts are well balanced (i.e. voting for a favorite show).
- Writing a lot of reviews, (reviews rank well in Google)
- Advanced users,
- You can get students to make them and test each other
- Managing the maintenance and security of your website
- Ubuntu Linux will now shoe up
- What to put up your homepage to convert more customers
The idea is that a few of the ideas in the service list will be followed by the organization, and then the votes for that idea will be “freed” back to the voters for use on other ideas. That idea relies on users returning to the site multiple times–something no museum really can count on. Positives of service: Does not require registering an account to suggest an idea, comment, or vote.
There is only a free version currently with no ads. Negatives of service: The vote cover may be confusing and or limiting to users. Best use for museums: If you wish to invite visitors to vote on topics and require them to really value their votes, the service is actually a strong tool. Maybe it’s dreamed by me being utilized, for example, in a weather change exhibition to ask visitors and staff recommend energy-saving options for the organization and for people to vote on which they think the institution should prioritize.
One key requirement to make any of these systems successful is that you must place it prominently in your physical museum or on your website such that individuals can easily access it when they have their question or comment. That’s more likely to occur in the museum than online.
This can also be the start of a great “online expansion” activity for visitors. Rather than falling their comment cards into the dark hole of an indicator package, they could start conversations and engagement with the institution–originating with both negative and positive impressions–that continue for a long time. One of the most interesting things I noticed as I scanned the complete Foods GetSatisfaction site was just how many topics began negative, and ended up becoming polite, engaging discussions between customers and employees. Even though the tone of the Whole Foods employees is very marketing-ish, it is also personal, and it seems to work. Annoyed people are transformed.
They are spending more virtual time with the brand, and with real people associated with it. They are experiencing conversations. And I think that’s encouraging a few of them to go back to the store. Why let Whole Foods have the fun all? How do you use comment cards in your museum, and how do you want to see them evolve?
The stone is heavier than the same level of water. In a nutshell the thickness of the stone is more than water. So the rock does not float on water. Does a computer weigh greater than a chair? Are stone floors inexpensive? What is the chemical formula of a rock?
There is more than one type of stone, and more than one formula. A couple of thousands. Then Even, most stones are mixtures and so do not have chemical formulas. Who has been more lucrative Scooter or Queens of the rock age? Scooter has been more successful than Queens of the stone age. Who faster a rock or crumpled paper?